EDITORIAL
MARCH
Notes on stuff that happened
in MARCH, 2013.
(The Swamp) --
Did It Matter to Beethoven That He Could Not Hear His Ninth Symphony, Fourth Movement?
We are told that by the time Beethoven wrote the 4th Movement of his 9th Symphony, he was stone deaf. Several accounts from various authors, some accurate, others not so believable, tell of friends shouting at him from near distances at this time in his life, and having to run up to catch him, in order to get his attention. Others tell of doctors' statements and so forth, so that there is little doubt that he could not hear. But did it matter?

Most music historians agree that Beethoven was stone deaf by the time he wrote his 9th Symphony, 4th Mvt.
This philosophical question rarely comes up in academic circles because it is so very, very difficult to answer. Not only do we need to know if the genius of Beethoven extended to that physical part of his brain to the point that he actually heard the music as it played, but also, did he need to hear the music, physically. And, if he could not do one or the other, did it matter to him: a. because he had built into his masterpiece enough simple percussion to tell him where he was in the piece, or b. because he could cue his brain to "hear" the music from the quality of the percussive variations in the piece.
We know he did not write his music like Mozart, who was probably an Asperger's Savant. But what we also may never know is what he saw and heard in his head, as he wrote each note and orchestration. But we have clues.
The fact that Goethe, Schiller, and Beethoven were all good buddies meant that emotionalism, especially Romantic era emotionalism accompanied every thought and process. Even though he is considered THE "Classical" composer, Beethoven did his most prolific composing during the heart of the Romantic period - and that meant PASSION.
I would dare to posit that Ludwig von Beethoven could, in fact, hear every note of his 9th Symphony, 4th Movement, complete with every voice of the chorale with poetry from his friend, Schiller, and ideas from his friend, Goethe, IN HIS HEAD. Every note. Every phrasing. Every dynamic. I believe it, because of his passion, his drive, and his love of life and art. But I only know this after years of study, standing on the shoulders of giants in the various fields of physics, anatomy, theatre, philosophy, and music.
Today and tomorrow, nine Justices of our highest court will begin to pick apart whether it is just to redefine what the national definition of marriage is. It is as difficult a charge and as ponderous as the above philosophical question. The outcome will have every bit as much importance to the citizens of America as sound was to Beethoven.

Will they do it on the cheap, as the political Gay movement would have it done, washing away centuries of custom and physical knowing? Will the Justices take a monolithic religious tack, which would be just as ill-serving? Is this about States' Rights vs Federal Supremacy, or are we witnessing the end of a type of South Carolina cultural gentleness that says "don't ask, don't care."

Becket's death changed everything, and even though it took another 300 years, this incident was the thorn that ended any hope of a via media between the churches in England and Rome.
Once forced to side, will we like what we see? Will we like whom we see? Once Hugh de Morville, Reginald FitzUrs, William de Traçy, and Richard le Breton killed Thomas à Becket, Henry II would never put things right, again.
There is no doubt that we are all deaf. The question is, "Do we have the genius to hear the music we have written?"
Well, Shut My Doors!
All over the State, and especially in job-challenged Columbia, restaurants
and some multi-outlet businesses have been closing some of those outlets. Some have been
just out-right going out of business. Those closings have been reported, but not one single
report told you WHY they were doing what they were doing.

The Obamacare Organizational Map
Things sounded a little, to quote a recent McDonald's commercial, "fishay - fishaaayyy."
So, your intrepid commentator strapped on his galoshes, threw on his macintosh, and went out
to find out the answer. As it turned out, the answer was fairly simple: Obamacare. With the prohibitively
expensive new rules going into effect, the small margins made by restaurants will be swallowed up. It is literally
cheaper to go out of business for some bistros. For others, who have expanded to two or three other shops,
they'll need to close some of them.
Not only are eat-shops closing down, but also drug stores. CVS has closed drug stores in several
markets to keep their employees under per market area minimums. One small pharmacy chain has
been rumored to be changing all their full-time employees' relocation to nullification-states, or part-time employment.
Ironically, if the South Carolina legislature passes and enforces the nullification of Obamacare statute,
all of these closings and changes will have been for naught. At least in this state. But none of these
businesses can be blamed for trying to protect themselves from what can only be called fascist revocation of personal
freedoms.
Play Dough

Play Dough - more core value than the US dollar.
As the stock market continues to react like an untrained one-year-old Cumberland Sheepdog,
I keep remembering that the Fed continues to quietly print and infuse nearly worthless digital money
into it through several big banking "friends." This will be the umpteenth time I've written about this since
2009. But even then, it wasn't new. John Wrisley, a powerful thinker and one of the finest broadcasting talents in the history of the media,
has banged this drum for many years before I even knew such things were a threat. He has his own website which you
should visit. If you feel the urge to contact him, tell him I said, "Hey!"
Anyway, there is what the Chinese call a "double dragon" waiting to pounce on Americans - a
double dragon of our government's own making. Because the Fed has been artificially inflating the stock market,
while artificially inflating the money supply (printing money for which there is no actual fungible backing), when
those who have used the system to get all they can out of it, have done so, and begin selling off, the house of cards
will collapse.
At that point, all of us who have been warning about this will be vindicated.
The problem is that trillions of dollars in American treasure will also be lost. Again. The Democrats will
blame Bush. The Republicans will blame Obama and the Democrats. Both will be partially right.
And what happens then? Polite discussion? Arm wrestling? Riots? Martial law? We
can posture all we want, but no-one will actually know what will happen until it actually happens. In our State, I'm hoping for reason,
some sharing, and a whole lot of nullification of Federal "help." But it will take a will of iron.. Because
all around us, things will be awful. AWFUL.
I'm Thinking Francis the Ist Should Get Some Respect
Assuming that you've read the article about Lord Acton and his famous axiom about
power and corruption (linked at the bottom of this page), let's jump into five good reasons to respect the
new Bishop of Rome.
- He's actually humble.
This may come as a bit of a surprise, considering he is a prince of the church, but he's not the only one of his
breed. There are thousands of Orthodox, Anglican, and Roman prelates, thousands of Protestant ministers and
Jewish Rabbanim and Muslim Imamët and Taoist, Buddhist, Hindu, and Sikh holy men whose names we will never know,
who daily care for the seeking and lost, the naked and hungry, the sick and dying. Why should Francis I, simply
because he is now famous, not also be one, too - can he not also sing the song of the saints of God? The pressure
to maintain his humility in the face of all the fawning sycophants will be like Satan's temptation of Christ, but
if anybody has a chance to rise above it, surely this guy might just be one.

Even after he was elevated to Pope, Francis I went, himself, to check
out of his modest hotel diggs. That kind of humility will be hard to hang
on to - a true challenge for a truly humble man.
- He's a Christian Capitalist
And he is genuinely hated for it by the left, even in his own country of Argentina. So much so, that he has been lied about
by the leftists and even thrown in jail by them, because he refused to take sides in the endless wars
between the godless communists and the godless buddy capitalists (fascists.) He believes that you build it
yourself, and THEN you VOLUNTARILY give and give, not steal it in the form of taxation.
- He's a True Biblical Fundamentalist
That is, he believes that everything in the scriptures is fundamentally true. As a Jesuit, he knows that not
EVERYTHING is to be interpreted by mundane standards - Bishop Ussher was a dunce, for instance - but
there are undeniable facts which are also historically true, all of this is in the complete Bible.
- He's A Conservative Sacramentalist
If you're a Protestant, you can move on to number 5, but for those of us who hold to an orthodoxy which
includes sacraments, this part is important. No matter how you express them, Communion, Baptism, Confirmation,
Marriage, Orders, Confession, and Unction (or healing) are vital expressions of God's love. They are outward
and visible signs of inward and spiritual Grace ordained by God as a means of obtaining that grace - not the
only way, but A way. Not everyone has the gift of Faith, and so we have these gifts of Grace. Well, Francis I
is a big, and I mean BIG, believer in the purity and sanctity of the sacraments. In a time when the Northern
Hemisphere Anglicans want to re-write the rules, it's good to know, at least SOMEBODY still believes in them.
- He's An Evangelist
This could be the most important facet of the new Pope's attributes. St. Francis prayed, in so many words,
that the Lord would give him the strength to meet each person at their own level, so that he would be "an
instrument" of God's Grace. In the Middle Ages that meant poverty, because most were poor while
the Church, which had supplanted the State, was rich. Today, when it is the overbearing state that keeps men poor, the Church can
be a powerful tool to stand between the State and the common man to let him be free to earn an honest
living. That, in itself, will be a challenge, because the left has tried to destroy the true meaning of Christ
since the advent of Marx and Engels. Francis I can be a true Evangelical, bringing people to God by
introducing them to His knowable person and the love and wonder that comes with it.
Here's hoping I'm not just seeing what I want to see. But you have to admit, religion-wise,
it's been a pretty dismal twenty years or so for us conservative Christians. It would be nice to see a real man
of God taking a real direction that isn't off a cliff.
The Speech You Didn't Hear Much About on Your Local News
Thursday Evening, Because They Depend on Their National News Orgs..
SC Sen. Tim
Scott's Inspiring Speech Before CPAC on Thursday Afternoon:
Selling Google
Something very interesting has happened. Over the last four months or so, when you
use Google.com for an answer, you are directed toward websites providing something to buy. As an example,
let's say you want to know what mSATA means. You saw the letters on the side of your laptop, and your
girfriend, who thinks the crack of dawn is a joke about a singing group, but whose dad is a microbiologist, has
HDMI on the side of hers. You google "mSATA vs HDMI - difference."
Four months ago, you would have gotten an in-depth, pretty good analysis of the two
terms from maybe a million blogs, plus a hundred universities, yahoo.com, and the ubiquitous wikipedia.com.
This morning, you would have started to get those pages about 15 to 20 pages in, but not before having to
endure fifteen to 20 pages of websites trying to sell you motherboards which either convert micro-SATA
ports to standard SATA ports of Televisions which connect to laptops which are lucky enough to come
equipped with HDMI connections, etc.. Get the picture? (sorry.. it just came out..) [Incidentally, this "new"
business paradigm has been in effect since the beginning of Google Scholar and is the major reason very few
know about it.]
The point is that someone pointed out to GOOGLE that they're not growing enough to
satisfy their shareholders and that the stock is in jeopardy of another destructive decline. They're trying
to bring up the P&L sheet by selling undocumented placement.
And they have every right so to do. So far, this is still America. So far.
The problem comes in the decrease in the quality of service. When you don't get
your research question answered, you go to a different search engine. Because Google doesn't have a
monopoly on search enginizing, like Duke Power or SCE&G (SCANACORP) over electricity, this will
hurt their bottom line. As it should.
O, that our Federal Government could be so efficient!
Critical Thinking and Black and White Movies
I just came from a fascinating dinner with four young 20-somethings. All four have
successful employment in jobs which they either created or enlarged as their ideas and hard work
became more valuable to their businesses. The two married couples were also products of the state's
school system and were, in no small way, self-taught, when it came to success in their different business
fields. In other words, what they learned in high school didn't do them a damn bit of good. And only
some of what they learned in college helped them.
What do you think was the thing they learned to do in college that helped them?
Was it the basics of business economics, or the history of the caning of certain odious
Yankee politicians, or the philosophy of Heideggerian phenomenology?
Actually, it could have been any one or all of the afore-mentioned courses, if,
and that's an important if, that course included critical thinking.
See, it's one thing to subject minds to information like radiation, it's quite another
to feed a mind information and then nurture that information by inviting that mind to think
critically about that information. It's not necessarily an easy thing to do; I've actually had
students complain that their heads hurt, after successfully maneuvering a thought experiment.
The topic of conversation, tonight, was Black & White movies and why young people
find them boring. My example of a great movie that everybody ought to enjoy was Michael Curtiz's Casablanca.
The one truly great film critic of our times, Roger Ebert likes best, YasujirĂ´ Ozu's Tokyo Story.
(Although my favorite Japanese movie is either Kurosawa's Rashomon or Seven Samurai (Shichinin'no Samurai).)
And what about Fellini's 8⅛, or, Mike Nichols' Who's Afraid of Virginia Wolfe, and ALL
are in black & white. But no matter how great they may be, reasoned observation one young man
testified, showed that young people are bored - not because it was truly boring, but because it was
in B&W. We also agreed that had they been shot in color,
it might have ruined the movies mentioned above,
but more young people might have seen them as worthy. It was astounding and it made me think
Critical thinking, while being done by my dinner guests, isn't being done, at least about movies,
by many Young South Carolinians. This is disturbing. It's disturbing because if many young adults of today aren't
thinking critically about something as simple and surface as black and white movies, we cannot expect them to think critically about
something as deep as the concept of the goodness of emptiness of humans in life as seen in Rashomon and how that
might apply to moral political decisions.
This editorial is not about dumb students or bad high schools or even poor thinking skills. What I want us all to contemplate
is that there is an entire generation who perceive even vital works of cinema art in an entirely different way, simply because it
has been presented to them in the wrong way so effective that it would literally take reprogramming worthy of a Scientology detox
just to fix one person. When we talk about the "dumbing down of America", we're not just talking about math and history and philosophy
and the Constitution. We're talking about the entire function of a thinking society which literally keeps them from asking
the question, "How do you know that?"
Habent Papa

Congratulations to Francis I, new Bishop of Rome. Just don't get any big ideas about
the Church of England giving the Falklands to Argentina. Otherwise everything's off to a great start.
The Steel of Dolly Parton Made Real on the Screen
With the country going to hell every ten seconds and half the Party we all thought
was there to fight with us actually fighting against us, this editorial is going to sound just plain nuts, or at least out of place,
but it's something that I feel important. If you don't like it, please accept my apologies, but I just can't help
it.

Desperately poor times shaped her amazing talent which she used to earn her way in life.
There is a TV special series showing at various times on Ovation TV Channel called Song by Song. It's a look at all of Dolly Parton's songs, one by one. It's special because it's about the TRUTH about Dolly Parton.
I always knew she was smart - I learned that when I got a chance to interview her way back when. What I didn't
know was that she is the reason for her own success. She is a pure, born again Capitalist. Her God is God, but
her brain is her own and her ways are pure Friedman. HARD HARD WORK. She does it and she expects it of others. She listens to
her fans. I declare to this day that Oprah would be nowhere had she not learned how to be a humn being from Dolly.
And while Dolly Parton is way too smart to be the leader of our new political endeavor, we might just know somebody who knows somebody who can get her to "hep."
The 41 Party, Again.
I haven't written anything for a while because I wanted the previous headline
to sink in. Now, I want to revisit the idea of starting a third party. Especially, now that
it appears that Sen. John McCain has become the enemy of true freedom or any idea that
doesn't originate from him.
For some reason, probably, because I have only voted in Republican primaries since
1984, most people think I am a Republican. This is not so. Although you will not find my name on
any Democrat role, I never removed my name. I just stopped attending the meetings in the late '70's
when the local Democratic leaders started quoting socialists.
I didn't worry about not being understood, or the loss of power, or the
inability of being heard. I didn't burn any bridges or cuss anybody - I just picked up, left, and kept
talking about what I thought was right. Somewhere along the way, I figured out what I later
learned were the major parts of libertarianism - or at least what most people think libertarianism
is, mostly.
But even that wasn't libertarianism -
not as defined by L. Neil Smith, the wonderful Science Fiction writer. He and I differ on how much
small government there should be - I'm for a super-power strength army, good cops, good courts, good schools, good roads,
and that's all. He's for an army - maybe - he's still deciding. I believe in the Constitution we've got, even
though our side lost the Late Unpleasantness. But we both agree that we must return to the original
understanding of the Bill of Rights.
But what does that mean? Most people have no idea what many early Georgian English nouns
mean, let alone the Jacobean and Elizabethan English nouns that were still in existence when the first ten
amendments were ratified. I'm not going to try to give a tell-all here, but there are a couple of outstanding
definitions that will prove my point nicely enough.
A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people
to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.
"Well regulated" does not mean, as we would think, today, "properly set about with rules on how
to act," but "properly fitted out with appropriate weapons," which is a whole 'nother kettle of fish. In other words,
in order to have enough of the right kinds of weapons to properly defend the security of a free state, the people should
keep and bear more than a couple of pistols - like bazookas and, maybe, surface-to-air missiles, and, perhaps, the family
tank. Whoa there, pony! So we're not talking about "hunting rights" after all, as the Progressives and other misinformed
Senators would have it. We're actually talking about the ability to enforce the Constitution by MAKING the Senate
and Congress DO ITS JOB! And, by the way, that's NOT overthrowing the government, either, as one low-information
Senator said the other day.

THIS is why we need to have a THIRD PARTY. Not because the other two are evil, but because the
other two have no intention of returning our country to its basic, self-defending roots. Also, they are IN power, and
they want to STAY IN POWER, which is basically what Lord Acton warned against (see Acton's Axiom).
There will be those who think that the task of starting a third party is too daunting, but it's
really fairly simple. All you need is someone who's a good fundraiser, and forty-one people of good character who
can devote their time and energy to running for congress - six for the Senate and 35 for the Federal Legislature.
Hopefully we can convince people - Republicans - who are already in office to come over - it's not as hard as you
may think, now that John McCain has arrogantly declared war on the Tea Party members.
It's simple. With 41, the Bill of Rights can control the conversation in Washington, DC. With
41, the conversation returns to the will of the people and away from the avarice of the lazy.
Think about it. We'll talk some more. You can write me at news@swampfoxnews.com and we can
continue this discussion.
Please Allow Me To Be The First To Call Sen. John McCain A "Douche"
How dare that loser, that posturing shadow of a former hero trade the Constitution
for a few more seconds of fleeting fame! What Rand Paul did was heroic. McCain is a silly person for
trying to trade on Paul's stand against the Imperator. McCain ought to be embarrassed - if that were only possible!
And you people in Arizona look like boobs for having elected that senile has-been, instead of JD..
And Lindsey.. stop being McCain's punch line. That's embarrassing, too. You're suppose to
be defending the Constitution, not playing patty-fingers with the Fascists at expensive restaurants. And,
yes, you really do need to dump McCain as your date.
You could learn a lot from our Junior
Senator, Tim Scott, who was THERE, on the FLOOR of the SENATE, supporting fellow REPUBLICAN
Rand Paul, instead of sounding like an illegal mexican chihuahua as you metaphorically stabbed him in the back,
the next day. You have been around McCain so long, you have become a friend-waster. Please, please, PLEASE
get away from that man before you go down with his ship!
.38 Police Special & The Democrats' Idea of Rape Prevention
Really? REALLY?? PEE on an attacking rapist and THAT will save you? Ask him not to do it?
Remind him that you know him? Vomit on him? Really?
This isn't about telling women they have to have a gun. And you can't train criminals not
to rape - that's equally stupid. Yet every single one of these arguments are being proffered by desperate
Democrats and other pathetic liberals and progressives, looking for ways to justify gun control.
The sad truth is that there will never be a safe society. There will never be a life without risk. And, most
importantly, there will never be a life without responsibility. Every thoughtful woman should train with and own a .38 police special
or bigger sidearm.
Look into a mirror. YOU are responsible for YOU. Not the government, and certainly not a Democrat.
And as far as Lindsey's new gun law is concerned, I'm not sure there should be any federal
gun law other than as part of punishment for a federal crime - maybe that's what he's proposing, when it comes to a
"not guilty by reason of insanity" finding. I'd like to see it first, before I comment on it.
Using the Moms Mabley Rule:
Hugo Chavez of Venezuela is dead. Good.
Market High Market Schmigh

The daily volume average is so puny it doesn't help make any argument to invest.
No real volume. $mells like 1987. The market is reflecting the inflation which
HRH Barry I and the Fed are hiding with pumping and flushing and changing markers every other week..
Otherwise, in an honest administration, which we do not have, we would easily see it's stagflation, which is
what we really have. Olay! Olay! The bull is already dead, but nobody knows it!
In Belated Praise and Vindication of Glenn Beck
Now that His Royal Highness Barack The 1st, Imperator of America,
has been proven to be a liar as well as a bully(see the comparisons covering
the most recent foreign policy statements, the debt ceiling, and the effects of the sequestration on youtube.com),
those in the mainstream media, or MSM, who have been hiding his lies, are looking pretty vulnerable.
I remember when Fox News Channel dropped Glenn Beck. It was done with a minimum amount of
fanfare, but the message was obvious - they thought his message was too radical. He talked about
how the President's ideals would eventually force him to lie. How his way of doing things would eventually
lead in the same direction as Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals because he had taught the subject
as an adjunct professor in Chicago. But those in the know said he had to go. So he was gone.

Glenn Beck was right
Well, now the cat is out of the bag, and Beck has been vindicated. No less
a personage than Watergate Saint, Bob Woodward, showed up Obama as the cheap liar and bully for
what he was. And he didn't even have to call him a bully or a liar - he just reported the facts. Now,
all the president's men are attacking him just the way Nixon's men did in the early 70's. Only this time
the President's men report for the New York Times and WaPo and MovOn and other wasters of electricity,
bandwidth, and paper.
The problem can be found in many of our best colleges' J-schools. ADVOCACY journalism
is a poison which pervades and destroys budding minds, looking for meaning and purpose. It is the very
personification of wickedness in which propaganda parades as truth, and cowards do not put the word "opinion"
or "editorial" at the top of their opinion columns. Students are told that they need to
"do good," rather than "to do good is to tell the WHOLE truth, no matter who it hurts." So none of them
wind up telling the whole truth, because it doesn't "help" the people THEY think need helping. And that's
a sin.
I am happy for Beck's vindication, even if Congress is too cowardly to impeach HRH Barak I.
But I am very, very sad for some of our most prestigious journalism schools. How do we ever recover?
ALL THE PRESIDENT'S MEN ARE NOW MSM REPORTERS!
'Nuff said..
Sequestration My Big Fat Butt!
85-Billion dollars is not a lot, and it's not even a cut! It's a slight - that's SLIGHT - reduction
in the GROWTH of spending. HRH Obama I has told his people to WITHHOLD funds from various accounts
to make it LOOK as if spending has been CUT. If you don't believe me, check back in 4 years, after he's gone,
and we'll look at the records... if they haven't all been burned or shredded.
Oh, and the market is starting to act like the market did in 1987, right before it plummeted 50%.
Up 100 - down 200 - up 175 - down 150 - etc., etc., etc... Not saying it's going to do that, but it's getting
really scary, and our money is $16-TRILLION worth of NOTHING.. Jus' sayin'..
(click here to read last month's Pokes
and Prods -
use browser back button to return)
(click here to
go to the all articles archives)
- Dick Anderson.

©2013 - 2014
SwampFoxNews.com