(America) - Neil Cavuto.. you gotta love him. The humble man with the huge head, on Fox, who probably knows more about money than anyone else, saw what the inexperienced reporter on CNN did to the guy in the Chicago tax crowd. In case you didn't see it on youtube (and unless you're a CNN insider, you don't know her name, either), a female reporter, trusting in what she must have thought was her intellectual and moral superiority, tried to argue with someone in the Chicago Tea Party crowd about a sign he was carrying which depicted a cartooned photo of Obama as Hitler. After losing the battle of "wits" with the obstinate man, she moved to an easier prey - a man holding a child. Our sources say that she was going to try to intimidate him with the fact that 12 billion dollars were going to his state to pay for children's care - this, of course was a complete falsehood, the money will eventually go to the friends of Richard Daley - but she did not get that far.

Just like the eloquent, Joe-the-Plumber, Norm-the-father stated eloquently and simply that the expenditure of capital does not justify additional expenditure of capital, something even a Keynesian would agree with. She, poorly following in the footsteps of much brighter and more talented female reporters of CNN of LONG ago, tried to change the subject and attack from a different angle. But Norm-the-father wouldn't be put off point.

Eventually, after trying to talk over the man's answer, just cut him off amid the yells of protest from the gathered thousands. It was a low day for journalism, to say the least.

Anyway, Cavuto saw it and brought Norm-the-father onto his show, the following Friday.

What was so amazingly astounding about the whole thing was not that he was obviously eloquent - we already knew that from the video clip - but that he was afraid to give out his last name! He had seen what Obama's A.C.O.R.N. people had done to Joe-the-plumber, not to mention Obama's major media sycophants.

Folks, this is just plain wrong!

A person should be free to speak his mind, regardless of the political content. Liberals demand this from the Constitution and our country, and rightly so! Why, then, do they cower so before the power of free speech? Because it is not Free speech that they seem to desire, but rather THEIR speech and their's alone which they feel should be protected...

It's arrogant, uneducated, and anal. But it's what you get from people who argue from emotion and not logic.

And I'll go further than that: The anger of Liberals will cause anger from their opposition. Maybe that's what they want. Maybe chaos is all they understand.

I'm willing to bet that the Tea Party is far from over, and the ranks, now, will grow ever increasing as people discover how Liberals and self-styled "progressives" treat people with whom they disagree.

Remember, please, why people drink coffee in America.

- Dick Anderson